Town Meeting Results 2019

Put away your yard signs and cushions for those metal gymnasium seats: town meeting season is now over.

Across New Hampshire, we saw mostly positive votes for preservation initiatives: from the creation of heritage commissions to the seeding of capital reserve funds to the successful transfer of historic properties.


The following towns approved planning studies for historic buildings: Alexandria (for their 1913 town hall), Gilmanton (for the old town hall in Gilmanton Iron Works), and Meredith, where the 2016 Seven to Save Meredith Public Library will get $400,000 in pre-construction services to address keeping the historic building downtown.

Capital Reserve Funds

Fitzwilliam voters approved $250,000 to help fund restoration of their town hall.

Fitzwilliam voters approved $250,000 to help fund restoration of their town hall.

Many towns were prompted to ask voters to appropriate funds to address needs in preparation for (or as a result of) planning studies. These towns include Alexandria, which created an expendable trust for town hall preservation; Effingham, which added $20,000 to its fund for their historic town hall and library; Fitzwilliam, which voted to add $250,000 into its fund to preserve their historic meetinghouse/town hall; and Wilmot, which added $50,000 to its reserve fund for their town hall.

Alton voters approved $14,000 for their town hall; Ashland’s library will increase their fund by $20,000; Grafton approved $25,000 for the library capital reserve fund; Barrington’s Town Buildings Preservation and Rehabilitation Fund Capital Reserve was upped by $50,000; Bennington’s Dodge Memorial Library received $5,000; and the Bethlehem Country Club (a town-owned golf course with 1912 club house) will now have its funding set aside in a revolving fund.

Planning Tools

Kensington becomes the state’s newest Heritage Commission after failing at the polls last year (perseverance pays off!). Hampton also voted to re-establish its Heritage Commission, reversing a 2015 decision to disband it.

Three new towns adopted RSA 79-E, or the downtown revitalization tax incentive. Francestown, Loudon, and Troy can now offer property tax relief for historic properties that undergo extensive rehabilitation within downtown boundaries. An attempt to pass 79-E in Kingston failed. Nearly 40 towns in New Hampshire now offer this program.

Two attempts to change historic district boundaries got different results. In Bedford, a proposal to remove a property from the local historic district failed. In Gilmanton, however, a petitioned article to remove a property from one of the town’s historic districts passed.

Preservation Projects

Lee’s Parish House was spared from demolition thanks to efforts by the Heritage Commission and Historical Society.

Lee’s Parish House was spared from demolition thanks to efforts by the Heritage Commission and Historical Society.

Several Seven to Save properties will see investment this year thanks to voters. In Canterbury, 2018 Seven to Save Turning Mill Pond dam received $25,000. The Lee Parish House (2018) was spared from demolition for another year while the historical society and Heritage Commission work to study its potential reuse. In Bartlett, school district voters approved the transfer of the former St. Joseph Catholic Church (2017) to the Bartlett Historical Society, which is currently raising money for rehabilitation.

In Moultonborough, the French-Taylor House (2017) was also spared from demolition thanks to good work by the Heritage Commission. There, voters instead opted to sell the house to a local couple who pledge to rehabilitate it and use it to sell home décor. Londonderry voters approved $20,000 for the Londonderry Grange (a Seven to Save category from 2013). And in Rye, voters once again rejected a proposal to spend $3.5 million to raze the historic town hall (2015) and construct a facsimile. Instead, voters approved a measure to lay future proposals involving demolition of the town hall to bed.

Charlestown’s Silsby Library got its matching LCHIP funds for masonry repairs.

Charlestown’s Silsby Library got its matching LCHIP funds for masonry repairs.

Several LCHIP projects will also move forward thanks to appropriations at town meeting. Charlestown voted $160,500 for masonry repairs to the Silsby Library and North Hampton voted $50,000 for Centennial Hall.

Alstead’s remarkable Shedd-Porter Library will get $105,600 in masonry repairs, a building that received a planning study from the Preservation Alliance in 2009. Back in Bethlehem, voters approved an article that directs the selectmen to pursue a long-term lease for the municipal country club. And in Pembroke, voters approved $34,420 for continued maintenance of the Suncook Clock Tower (which won a Preservation Achievement Award in 2001).

What We’re Still Watching

Not all town efforts were successful, however, and the Alliance is still watching a few votes unfold. In Durham, Oyster River School District voted for $800,000 in pre-construction costs for a new $45 million middle school, which will likely replace the historic one.

Carroll’s Town Hall will soon become obsolete and in need of a new use after voters approved construction of a new complex.

Carroll’s Town Hall will soon become obsolete and in need of a new use after voters approved construction of a new complex.

In Hooksett, voters rejected spending $200,000 from the town’s surplus to fund continued rehabilitation at the historic town hall. In Pembroke, voters directed the town to cease owning and maintaining the former fire station at 4 Union Street (also known as the Perry Eaton Building) – a contributing building to the village’s National Register Historic District. And in Carroll, voters approved a $4.455 million bond to build a new town hall/library/public safety complex, rendering the historic town hall without an immediate or obvious use.

What did we miss? Let us know.

Speak Up For Increasing LCHIP Grant-making and More Help for Community Projects: Bill Enjoys Strong Support in First Two Stops in Legislative Process

We hope you'll help us support a legislative proposal led by Senator Martha Fuller Clark to increase funding for the Land and Community Heritage Investment Program. The proposal adds $10 to certain deed recording fees, and is projected to add about $1.5 million a year to a level that has been at about $3.5-4 million/year.  As you may know first-hand, demand far exceeds available funds, and historic preservation activity supports jobs, enhances tax base and serves as a catalyst for additional community development activity. 

The bill cleared its first hurdle on Tuesday, March 5, when the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources voted 4-0 to advance the bill. On March 14 it advanced to the Senate Finance Committee with “yes” votes from Senators Jeb Bradley, Kevin Cavanaugh, Shannon Chandley, Martha Fuller Clark, Lou D’Allesandro, Jeanne Dietsch, Dan Feltes, Bob Guida, Martha Hennessey, Jay Kahn, Melanie Levesque, Cindy Rosenwald, Tom Sherman, David Starr, Ruth Ward and David Watters. Now on to the Senate Finance Committee! Representatives from local projects in need as well as statewide organizations like the Preservation Alliance and the Society for the Protection of N.H. Forests are in strong support of the bill.

  • The Preservation Alliance has worked with legislators and conservation partners to develop and build the impact of LCHIP over time on the state’s natural and historic resources. Click here to see all past LCHIP projects listed by Town.

  • Since 2000, LCHIP matching grants have preserved or revitalized 223 historic structures and protected over 283,000 acres of important natural resources.  For every $1 of grant funds invested in a project, the community raises almost $6 from other sources to match it. That far exceeds the 50% required level of match.

  • Between 2001 and 2017 $46.9 million of state money through LCHIP has led to a total investment in projects of over $316 million. Bringing all that new money into communities strengthens the local economy.

  • Over the last 10 years, 177 out of the 505 total applications received were not funded.  That figure indicates the demand and need for LCHIP continues, even 18 years after the Legislature established the program.

  • The Land and Community Heritage Commission that recommended the creation of LCHIP in 1999 determined a funding level of $12 million per year was needed to have a meaningful program. This amount has never been available. Demand for funding continues to exceed the amount available.

Here are some ways you can help:

Contact your Senator by phone, email or a note. Thank those who are supporting Senate Bill 75, and offer local examples and needs. Use this link for contact information.

Let us know if you have questions? Email

Many more community landmarks are in need of seed monies from LCHIP that will be a catalyst for additional fundraising and community development benefits. The tiny town of Acworth leveraged LCHIP grants to achieve a national award-winning rehab while supporting many local tradespeople.

Many more community landmarks are in need of seed monies from LCHIP that will be a catalyst for additional fundraising and community development benefits. The tiny town of Acworth leveraged LCHIP grants to achieve a national award-winning rehab while supporting many local tradespeople.

2018 in Review

Here at the Preservation Alliance, we want to share some of what we accomplished in 2018. All of this work is possible thanks to members and donors like you, our incredible statewide network of preservation practitioners, organizational partners and civic leaders. We think New Hampshire is special not only because of its tremendous historic buildings and communities but also because of this collaborative and generous spirit.

We granted 12  Condition Assessment Grants, of up to $4,500 in matching funds, thanks to a block grant through LCHIP. These reports assess the condition of a historic building, provide cost estimates, outline phases for preservation, and help unlock larger grant asks from LCHIP and other fundraising success.

2018's pool included 4 libraries, 3 churches/meetinghouses, and 3 town halls. The pool also included Seven to Save property, Lancaster’s Parker J. Noyes Block and the former Highland Lake Grange Hall in East Andover.

On the smaller side, we granted 4 Mini Grants, which were used to assess smaller buildings or garner a second opinion from a preservation professional. Some of these grants are made possible through the wonderful Richard and Duffy Monahon Fund.

Sandown’s new Heritage Commission will work with the Conservation Commission to assess and eventually restore this town-owned barn.

Sandown’s new Heritage Commission will work with the Conservation Commission to assess and eventually restore this town-owned barn.

21 more barns received barn assessment grants and today, more than 556 barns in 90 communities are enrolled in RSA 79-D, the barn tax incentive program. The leading towns? Cornish and Freedom at 20, followed by Deerfield and Sandwich at 19 and Plainfield at 18.

2 new heritage commissions started up this year, in Sandown and Mont Vernon.

We welcomed approximately 2,500 attendees to this year’s Old House and Barn Expo. Of those, 74% owned an old house, 70% were actively working on a house project, and 45% were working on barn project. (Steve Booth Photography)

insta combo.png

We continued to capture our state through our Instagram page. This year, we posted 97 photos of New Hampshire landmarks - from barns in Bristol to churches in Eaton.

In May, we awarded 11 preservation projects achievement awards. Read about them - they include a church converted into condominiums, a 1950s garage-turned-coffee shop, and some incredible before and afters in Ashland, Littleton, Franklin, and Rochester.

We added 7 new resources to our Seven to Save list at our October announcement in Washington. This list now stands at 94. This year, we celebrated the purchase of Keene’s Grace United Methodist Church (listed 2009) by local digital marketing firm, Paragon, who hopes to rehabilitate the building for an expanding business. Lancaster’s Parker J. Noyes Block (listed 2017) will also see progress thanks to its purchase and planned rehabilitation by the Northern Forest Center. We’re also watching the unfolding situation in Gilford, where Kimball Castle (listed 2013) was sold for use as a venue space.

One resource was lost this year. Shelburne’s Aston-Lessard barn (listed 2016) collapsed on November 29. Overall, about 50% of the Seven to Save properties are saved or seeing progress. Another quarter are stalled, waiting on progress.

23, 109. Miles driven by Preservation Alliance staff to visit with people like you and help save and revive places we can’t imagine New Hampshire without.

We can’t wait to do more in 2019!

View from the West Coast

From the Preservation Alliance’s executive director, Jennifer Goodman

My recent trip to San Francisco and the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s annual conference offered me updates and insights on the national preservation scene and how we are doing comparatively in the Granite State. Others like hearing from us too: over the years, I’ve presented and shared “best practices” including our work with conservation colleagues, preservation easements, creation and use of tax incentives, and barn preservation at this major event.  Special thanks to Innerglass Window Systems for supporting my trip!

Here are a few of my observations, with an over-arching “think big” theme:

Look beyond the building. Communities around the country and world are exploring the identification, promotion and stewardship of large cultural landscapes especially in the face of major energy projects (transmission lines, oil and gas development, etc.), and rising sea levels.  In New Hampshire, we have a good foundation for this sort of work: Preservationists and conservationists see the benefits of working together (and are often the same people!). National Register work done in the Dublin/Harrisville area and Squam Lakes watershed as well as Freedom’s Way Heritage Area (FWHA) in the south central part of New Hampshire and research done for the Northern Pass proposal offer good models.

In my presentation for a session called “Landscapes in Peril,” I offered advocacy strategies and emphasized the need for a proactive approach.  Some cool other examples I heard about: stewardship of the hill farms in the Lake District in England (a UNESCO World Heritage site with home of Beatrix Potter and lots of sheep) and the work of Jane Lennon in Australia. Also, check out

Reach beyond the norm.  When communicating the benefits of preservation investment, folks in New Hampshire and elsewhere frequently make the connection between preservation and community development, job creation, tourism and housing, and other disciplines; new information about the public health benefits of old buildings and preservation activity is useful and inspiring.

How else can we incentivize preservation? Other states without a state income tax like Texas have designed a rehabilitation credit tied to other state tax liabilities. San Francisco has an incentive to help smaller, long-standing businesses survive and thrive.

Use the joy in preservation work as fuel.  Preservation work is complex and challenging in and of itself. And speaker after speaker offered that “living with water” and recent storms and other weather events are our “new normal.” In the face of all of this, it’s especially important to tap the passion and reflect on the joy in preservation activity. Old buildings offer “belonging” or “coming home” feelings, and preservation projects bring people together.  One theme that I see over and over again is how smart, creative teams working together get things done -- that's how buildings get re-used and revived by local advocates, private and public sector developers, and how communities secure and sustain preservation investment.  Let’s do a lot more!

LCHIP Grants Millions to Preservation Projects

Today, the Land and Community Heritage Investment Program (LCHIP) granted nearly $4 million in matching dollars to land conservation and historic preservation projects across the state.

Of the 26 historic resources and 16 natural resources receiving grant money, five are Seven to Save properties, one received a $500 mini grant/planning study from us, one received a barn grant assessment, and eight received planning studies through our conditions assessment block grant (also funded by LCHIP, and also to be funded in 2019). We also coached seven successful projects through our field service program.

Planning Studies

This year, six properties received planning study grants from LCHIP. These grants allow for in-depth examinations of buildings, including mechanical systems, structural analyses, and condition assessments. Recipients include Chesterfield Historical Society’s Stone House Tavern, Great North Woods Committee for the Arts’ Former Shrine of Our Lady of Grace in Columbia, Fitwilliam Town Hall, Langdon Congregational Church, Tilton School Library/Mansion, and the NH Preservation Alliance (to redistribute as block grants for smaller assessments).

Of these, the Preservation Alliance was happy to assist in Chesterfield, Columbia, and Langdon.

Seven to Saves

Belmont’s Gale School (2017) will receive a $110,000 grant to help relocate the historic 1894 school threatened with demolition. 2018 listee, Turning Mill Pond at Canterbury Shaker Village, received a $97,339 grant to help repair a dam located within the cultural landscape of the National Historic Landmark district. Kimball-Jenkins Estate in Concord (2013 Seven to Save) will restore the mansion, with help from a $202,000 grant. In Alstead, Chase’s Mill received a second grant, this time for $150,000 to repair the exterior envelope of the building, including windows.

On the Natural Resource side, family farms (2014 Seven to Save) were represented by Farmington’s Scruton Dairy Farm - a fifth generation dairy farm that also received a barn assessment grant from the Alliance in 2015.

Planning Studies Yield Success Stories

Eight projects that received earlier planning studies through the NH Preservation Alliance will now see rehabilitation.

Those include Alstead’s Chase’s Mill; Farmington First Congregational Church (storm windows); Goshen Grange Hall (rehabilitation into town and SAU office space); Centennial Hall in North Hampton (rehabilitation of 2nd floor space); Plymouth’s Old Webster Court House (windows and basement improvements); Portsmouth Women’s Club (installation of sprinkler system); St. Matthew’s Chapel in Sugar Hill (foundation construction); and Whitcomb Hall in Swanzey (2nd floor rehabilitation).

Congratulations also to the following projects: Charlestown’s Silsby Free Library, Ladd-Gilman House in Exeter, Keene’s Ball Mansion (home of the Cheshire County Historical Society), Lebanon’s Kendrick-Wood House (home to the Upper Valley Music Center), Milton Free Library, Ingalls Memorial Library in Rindge, Rochester Opera House, and the Wolfeboro Freight Shed.

Since its incorporation in 2000, LCHIP has awarded over $43 million and protected over 257 historic buildings and conserved over 280,000 acres of land in a total of 157 communities. This investment - which now comes from a deed surcharge at the county level - has leveraged nearly $300 million in the program’s history.

The next LCHIP grant round opens in May 2019. If you are interested in creating a successful preservation project (that may or may not include LCHIP funding), please reach out to Andrew Cushing at the Preservation Alliance ( or 224-2281).

Laconia State School: Seven to Save Profile

The New Hampshire School for Feeble-Minded Children opened in 1903 and, from the outset, the School was a source of pride for Laconia. Its 247-acre campus set on a rise between Lake Winnisquam and Opechee Bay and was designed to be curative in nature. Here, children between the ages of three and twenty-one who could not get the care they needed at existing facilities (county poor farms or state hospitals, for example) could learn skills in an environment tailored for their needs.

Early on, there were two school sessions daily, where pupils were “given instruction in industrial work” – the girls made “raffia work, basketry, rugs and knitted items” and worked in the sewing rooms, while “the boys work[ed] on the farm and in the manual training shop.” The dairy herd was recognized as one of the finest in the state, and milk was processed at the Weeks Dairy in Laconia.

Boys digging for a cement wall at the Laconia State School. Courtesy photograph.

Boys digging for a cement wall at the Laconia State School. Courtesy photograph.

By August 1916, there were nearly 300 pupils on site with a large waiting list. The campus continued to grow to meet the increased need, but overcrowded conditions worsened through the Great Depression. (In 1924, the campus was renamed the Laconia State School.) By 1942, the population had increased to 600, and by 1974 over 1,000 residents called the Laconia State School home. Calls to increase funding were rejected by the state legislature until a successful lawsuit in 1978 forced the state to reduce the numbers of residents, increase staffing, renovate several buildings, and develop community-based mental health initiatives.

The institution was finally closed in 1991, leaving most of the historic brick buildings vacant. A state-sponsored redevelopment plan is currently underway and is charged with finding a solution that meets local and state goals. This plan is complicated by the site’s cultural and architectural history. For many New Hampshirites, the site represents a painful time in families’ pasts - stories that were chronicled in the documentary, “Lost in Laconia.”

The Laconia State School campus was determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Its campus of 20th century buildings, barns, stone walls, mature trees, and panoramic views make the site architecturally significant. Its history of institutionalizing children within this campus - regardless of the intended benevolence - makes the site equally significant. We should not erase histories that make us uncomfortable.

The agricultural history and opportunity is an important consideration in the site’s reuse. Photo courtesy of Cristina Ashjian.

The agricultural history and opportunity is an important consideration in the site’s reuse. Photo courtesy of Cristina Ashjian.


The Lakeshore Redevelopment Planning Commission’s website includes minutes of past meetings and planning documents. If you have thoughts about how this site should best be used to meet the needs of the State, Laconia, and those who lived or worked there, contact them.

The master planning is ongoing, but it’s best to participate sooner, rather than later.

Our thanks to historian, Gordon DuBois, for his history on the Laconia State School, and to Cristina Ashjian, for her photographs.

Manchester VA's Manager's Residence: Seven to Save Profile

After WWII, sixteen million veterans suddenly needed medical treatment and care. In response, the U.S. government built fifty-six new hospitals. New Hampshire had lobbied for a VA hospital since 1938, and it was finally granted in 1945. Construction started in Manchester in 1948, with a grand opening in June 1950.

In addition to the eight-story main hospital, the $5 million complex included twelve ancillary buildings set on a thirty acre campus designed by Boston landscape architecture firm, Shurcliff and Shurcliff. It was recently announced that six of these brick ancillary buildings - all designed in a modern Prairie style - would be demolished to make way for new construction and expanded parking.

VAMC Managers Residence - front.jpg

Because the site was determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places in 2011, and because it’s federal property, such action triggered the Section 106 process. The Manchester Heritage Commission and the N.H. Division of Historical Resources got involved and proposed a compromise: demolish five buildings, but keep Building #2 (known as the Manager’s Residence).

This house, stylistically unique in Manchester and the state, was originally built to house the hospital’s first chief administrator, Dr. George Pratt. Its horizontality - emphasized in its belt courses, low pitched roof, rectilinear chimney - and its cantilevered porch roof should conjure up another Manchester icon. The Frank Lloyd Wright-designed Zimmerman House was also built in 1950 and included many quintessential Wrightian Prairie style elements.

Preservationists in Manchester (and beyond!) are hoping that the VA administration will see the value of the Manager’s Residence and also the potential for its reuse as outpatient services. According to Aurore Eaton, of the Manchester Heritage Commission, “We hope that Seven to Save status will emphasize the importance of this building’s architecture, history, and potential for veterans care.”


Time is of the essence if we’re to help save this building. Contact NH’s delegation and let them know this piece of history matters more than parking spaces for several cars:

Senator Maggie Hassan’s person of contact is William Bateson, who can be reached by phone at (603) 880-3314 or by mail at 142 Main Street, Suite 520, Nashua, NH 03060.

For Senator Jeanne Shaheen, contact Christopher Scott at (603) 647-7500, or by mail at 2 Wall Street - Suite 200, Manchester, NH  03101.

For Congresswoman Ann McLane Kuster, contact Melanie Spears, VA & Military Outreach at (603) 226-1002 or by mail at 18 North Main Street - 4th Floor, Concord, NH 03301.

For Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter, contact the Dover office at (603) 285-4300 or mail to 660 Central Ave., Unit 101, Dover, NH 03820.

You can also contact Andrew Cushing at the NH Preservation Alliance with more questions.

Lee Parish House: Seven to Save Profile

When the Town of Lee purchased the land in between the town office complex and the Lee Church Congregational (not the Lee Congregational Church) in 2018, both parties had reason to celebrate. The town needed room to expand and the church did not need the property, but welcomed the money.

The problem: not everyone in town wanted the parish house that came with the land.

Lee Parish House 10.jpg

This “comfortable parsonage and outbuilding” was built in 1872 at a cost of $1,523.81, according to church records. The Italianate vernacular dwelling was not ostentatious, but it did include large rooms and a front entrance with etched glass double doors and a small bracketed porch roof. Compared to the much earlier houses in Lee’s village, the parish house was modern.

The parish house served as the minister’s house until tastes changed and it made more sense to rent the house. By 2018, though, the building had sat vacant for several years and the church and town started negotiations to transfer the property.

The 2018 town meeting warrant article called for the parish house to be removed from site by July 2019, allowing for the town to start with a clean slate. The Lee Historical Society and Lee Heritage Commission are instead hoping to re-purpose the building on site and retain its presence in the village. This solution, they argue, is cheaper and more sympathetic to a village that has undergone master planning for close to a decade.

The Town of Lee is not new to preservation. Recently, several buildings on the town-owned land next door were added to the State Register of Historic Places, including the 1846 Town Hall, 1915 tool shed with tramp room, and 1874 historical society building (former South Lee freight house). Also on site is the former 1897 schoolhouse-turned library. The village also received a Plan NH charrette in 2009, which yielded public feedback like “preserve the historical buildings,” “maintain architectural integrity of the village,” and “blend the church and parsonage into the village concept.”

The challenge is to convince town leaders and community members that preserving the parish house is in the best interest for everyone. Ideas for the building’s new life include expanded space for the Lee Historical Society or incorporating it into the need for town offices.


If you live in Lee, consider supporting the alternative solutions for the parish house. Get in touch with the Board of Selectmen and offer your assistance to the Heritage Commission or Historical Society.